Sam Palazzolo v. United States

249 F.2d 446
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 31, 1957
Docket13074_1
StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 446 (Sam Palazzolo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sam Palazzolo v. United States, 249 F.2d 446 (6th Cir. 1957).

Opinion

249 F.2d 446

Sam PALAZZOLO, Carl V. Viviano, and John A. Viviano, Individuals, Trading and Doing Business as Vivison Macaroni Company and as Viviano Bros. Macaroni Co., Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 13074.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

October 31, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Detroit; Thomas P. Thornton, Judge.

Marx, Levi, This & Wiseman, Detroit, Mich., argued by Robert S. Marx, Detroit, Mich., for appellants.

Fred W. Kaess and Donald F. Welday, Jr., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that the judgment be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the district court. See Poliafico v. United States, 6 Cir., 237 F.2d 97, 112.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poliafico v. United States
237 F.2d 97 (Sixth Circuit, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 F.2d 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sam-palazzolo-v-united-states-ca6-1957.