Sam H. Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company, James L. Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Company

478 F.2d 1208
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 18, 1973·No. 71-2243·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

478 F.2d 1208

Sam H. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PENROD DRILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
James L. STARNES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PENROD DRILLING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 71-2243 and 71-2245.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 18, 1973.

John M. Smith, Longview, Tex., Mat M. Gray, III, New Orleans, La., Sam B. Hall, Jr., Marshall, Tex., Joseph W. Milner, Shreveport, La., for defendant-appellant.

Scott Baldwin, Marshall, Tex., Joseph D. Jamail, Gus Kolius, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Nov. 21, 1972, 5 Cir., 1972, 469 F.2d 897)

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the Judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

It is ordered that these causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sam H. Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company, James L. Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Company, 478 F.2d 1208 (5th Cir. 1973).

478 F.2d 1208 (Sam H. Johnson v. Penrod Drilling Company, James L. Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Copeland v. Oil Transport, Inc.
362 F. Supp. 11 (S.D. Alabama, 1973)