Sam Francis Foundation v. Christie's, Inc.
769 F.3d 1195, 2014 WL 5486475
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 30, 2014
DocketNos. 12-56067, 12-56068, 12-56077
StatusPublished
This text of 769 F.3d 1195 (Sam Francis Foundation v. Christie's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sam Francis Foundation v. Christie's, Inc., 769 F.3d 1195, 2014 WL 5486475 (9th Cir. 2014).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
[1196]*1196Judges Wardlaw and Nguyen did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
769 F.3d 1195, 2014 WL 5486475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sam-francis-foundation-v-christies-inc-ca9-2014.