Sam Cash Enterprises Inc. v. George W. Smith & Son, Inc.
This text of 599 A.2d 1366 (Sam Cash Enterprises Inc. v. George W. Smith & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter came before a three-member panel of this court on December 17, 1991, pursuant to an order directing both parties to show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiff, Sam Cash Enterprises, Inc., appeals from the entry of summary judgment for the defendant, George Smith & Son, Inc. The plaintiff sued for breach of contract and/or quantum meruit damages. In response the defendant asserted accord and satisfaction and counterclaimed for breach of contract.
After consideration of the arguments and memorandum of counsel, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown. As we have often stated, we will affirm a trial justice’s granting of summary judgment when our review reveals that there are no issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Vito v. Dep’t of Environmental Management, 589 A.2d 809, 812 (R.I.1991). In the instant case we find that the trial justice neither misconceived nor overlooked material evidence in granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
Accordingly, the plaintiff’s appeal is denied and dismissed, and the judgment entered in Superior Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
599 A.2d 1366, 1991 R.I. LEXIS 208, 1991 WL 279435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sam-cash-enterprises-inc-v-george-w-smith-son-inc-ri-1991.