Sam Caruso v. United States
This text of 218 F.2d 957 (Sam Caruso v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From a conviction of conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws, Title 18 U.S. C.A. § 371; Title 21 U.S.C.A. § 174; and Title 26 U.S.C.A. § 2553(a), Sam Caruso appeals, claiming error in the district court’s instructions to the jury and in its failure to instruct as requested by appellant.
Upon an examination of the record and briefs, and after hearing the able argument of counsel in open court, it appears that there was no reversible error on the part of the district court in giving or refusing to give instructions to the jury; and the court being duly advised,
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 F.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sam-caruso-v-united-states-ca6-1954.