Sam Alta Dryden, James Warren and Ray Hutchison v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Sam Alta Dryden, James Warren and Ray Hutchison v. United States

241 F.2d 328, 50 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1644

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 21, 1957·No. 16116_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

found guilty by a The appellants were jury of conspiracy to violate certain sections of the Internal Revenue laws pertaining to nontaxpaid jdistilled spirits as well as of the substantive offense of violating such laws. On appeal the only contentions are that the District Court erred in refusing the motions of each of the defendants for judgment of acquittal as to each eour.t. We agree with the District Court that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict of the i jury. The judgment las to each of the appellants is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

found guilty by a The appellants were jury of conspiracy to violate certain sections of the Internal Revenue laws pertaining to nontaxpaid jdistilled spirits as well as of the substantive offense of violating such laws. On appeal the only contentions are that the District Court erred in refusing the motions of each of the defendants for judgment of acquittal as to each eour.t. We agree with the District Court that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict of the i jury. The judgment las to each of the appellants is therefore

Affirmed.

Sam Alta Dryden, James Warren and Ray Hutchison v. United States, 241 F.2d 328, 50 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1644 (5th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

241 F.2d 328 (Sam Alta Dryden, James Warren and Ray Hutchison v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.