Sam Alta Dryden, James Warren and Ray Hutchison v. United States
This text of 241 F.2d 328 (Sam Alta Dryden, James Warren and Ray Hutchison v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
found guilty by a The appellants were jury of conspiracy to violate certain sections of the Internal Revenue laws pertaining to nontaxpaid jdistilled spirits as well as of the substantive offense of violating such laws. On appeal the only contentions are that the District Court erred in refusing the motions of each of the defendants for judgment of acquittal as to each eour.t. We agree with the District Court that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict of the i jury. The judgment las to each of the appellants is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 F.2d 328, 50 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 1644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sam-alta-dryden-james-warren-and-ray-hutchison-v-united-states-ca5-1957.