Sam A. Barzilla, III v. United States Postal Service
This text of 79 F.3d 1152 (Sam A. Barzilla, III v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Sam A. BARZILLA, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-35519.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 12, 1996.*
Decided March 18, 1996.
Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Sam A. Barzilla, III appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action against the United States Postal Service for failure to state a claim. We agree with the district court that Barzilla's claims are foreclosed by Pereira v. U.S. Postal Serv., 964 F.2d 873, 876 (9th Cir.1992).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. All outstanding motions are denied as moot
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 F.3d 1152, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17156, 1996 WL 119512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sam-a-barzilla-iii-v-united-states-postal-service-ca9-1996.