Salzman v. Policemen's, C., Elizabeth
172 A. 516, 113 N.J.L. 37, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 335
This text of 172 A. 516 (Salzman v. Policemen's, C., Elizabeth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Salzman v. Policemen's, C., Elizabeth, 172 A. 516, 113 N.J.L. 37, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 335 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 40
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
172 A. 516, 113 N.J.L. 37, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salzman-v-policemens-c-elizabeth-nj-1934.