Salzman v. Policemen's, C., Elizabeth
172 A. 516, 113 N.J.L. 37, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 335
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None. *Page 40
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salzman v. Policemen's, C., Elizabeth, 172 A. 516, 113 N.J.L. 37, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 335 (N.J. 1934).
172 A. 516 (Salzman v. Policemen's, C., Elizabeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.