Salzman v. Konig

67 Misc. 419, 123 N.Y.S. 45
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant moved at the opening of the trial to dismiss the complaint, upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court thereupon suspended the trial and stated that, in the event of a denial of the motion, he would set the cause down for a future day for trial. Subsequently he granted the motion and dismissed the complaint, with costs. This was error. The motion should have been treated as a demurrer and leave given to the plaintiff to amend his com[420] plaint. Rogers v. Fine, 49 Misc. Rep. 633; Carpenter v. Pirner, 52 id. 485.

.The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. _

Present: Seabuby, Guy and Bijub, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salzman v. Konig, 67 Misc. 419, 123 N.Y.S. 45 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1910).

67 Misc. 419 (Salzman v. Konig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Fine
49 Misc. 633 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)