Salzman v. Konig
This text of 67 Misc. 419 (Salzman v. Konig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant moved at the opening of the trial to dismiss the complaint, upon the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court thereupon suspended the trial and stated that, in the event of a denial of the motion, he would set the cause down for a future day for trial. Subsequently he granted the motion and dismissed the complaint, with costs. This was error. The motion should have been treated as a demurrer and leave given to the plaintiff to amend his com[420]*420plaint. Rogers v. Fine, 49 Misc. Rep. 633; Carpenter v. Pirner, 52 id. 485.
.The judgment must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. _
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 Misc. 419, 123 N.Y.S. 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salzman-v-konig-nysupct-1910.