Salzano v. Hirtz

Second Circuit

Salzano v. Hirtz

353 F.2d 536

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 1965

DocketNo. 138, Docket 29728

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 353 F.2d 536 (Salzano v. Hirtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salzano v. Hirtz, 353 F.2d 536 (2d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an ordinary, run of the mill personal injury action. The parties differ on the place and manner of the accident, and on the causal relationship and extent of appellant’s injuries. Conflicting testimony was presented to the jury; there was substantial evidence to support the result that the jury reached.

Appellant claims numerous other trial errors. His contentions are either insubstantial or incorrect.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an ordinary, run of the mill personal injury action. The parties differ on the place and manner of the accident, and on the causal relationship and extent of appellant’s injuries. Conflicting testimony was presented to the jury; there was substantial evidence to support the result that the jury reached.

Appellant claims numerous other trial errors. His contentions are either insubstantial or incorrect.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

353 F.2d 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salzano-v-hirtz-ca2-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack