Salyers v. Salyers

127 S.W. 749, 138 Ky. 137, 1910 Ky. LEXIS 51
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided May 4, 1910·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Barker.

—-Affirming*.

This case comes to us on the motion of the defendants to dissolve the injunction granted by the court below. The plaintiff, who is the father of the defendants, instituted this action for the purpose of having canceled a conveyance by him of a tract of land and the timber thereon, described in the petition. The right to have the deed canceled is based [138] upon the alleged fraud and overreaching of the plaintiff by his sons, the defendants. The injunction was obtained for the purpose of restraining the der fendants from cutting the timber off of the land pendente lite.

Without going into the merits of the case at all, we have reached the conclusion that justice will be best subserved by allowing the injunction to remain in force until the case can be tried out on its merits; and for this reason the motion to dissolve the injunction is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salyers v. Salyers, 127 S.W. 749, 138 Ky. 137, 1910 Ky. LEXIS 51 (Ky. Ct. App. 1910).

127 S.W. 749 (Salyers v. Salyers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carmichael v. Old Straight Creek Coal Corp.
22 S.W.2d 572 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1929)
Colma Vegetable Assn. v. Bonetti
267 P. 172 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)