Salyers v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Salyers v. Commonwealth

307 S.W.2d 769

DecidedDecember 5, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 307 S.W.2d 769 (Salyers v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salyers v. Commonwealth, 307 S.W.2d 769 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of selling alcoholic beverages in local option territory, resulting in a fine of $100 and a 30 day jail sentence. He moves for an appeal on the grounds: (1) the trial court should have granted a continuance of the trial; (2) there was not sufficient proof of the time when the alleged offense took place; and (3) there was no competent evidence to show that Breathitt County is in local option territory.

We have considered each of these grounds, and are of the opinion that no reversible error is shown.

The motion for appeal is denied, and the judgment stands affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of selling alcoholic beverages in local option territory, resulting in a fine of $100 and a 30 day jail sentence. He moves for an appeal on the grounds: (1) the trial court should have granted a continuance of the trial; (2) there was not sufficient proof of the time when the alleged offense took place; and (3) there was no competent evidence to show that Breathitt County is in local option territory.

We have considered each of these grounds, and are of the opinion that no reversible error is shown.

The motion for appeal is denied, and the judgment stands affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 S.W.2d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salyers-v-commonwealth-kyctapp-1957.