Salyamov v. Lyhovsky

2017 NY Slip Op 929, 147 A.D.3d 450, 46 N.Y.S.3d 586
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 2017·No. 3009 152452/15·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered July 25, 2016, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

*451 Plaintiff asserts a legal malpractice claim based on defendant’s alleged failure to confirm that a sublessor of premises in which plaintiff wished to operate a business had the owner’s consent to assign the sublease at issue. However, there was no assignment of the sublease; the subtenant was a corporation whose stock plaintiff purchased in the transaction at issue. Further, it is undisputed that the master lease allowed the sublessor to sublet the premises without the owner’s consent.

Plaintiff’s additional theory of liability, that defendant failed to ascertain the status of the master lease, was improperly raised for the first time in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see Atkins v Beth Abraham Health Servs., 133 AD3d 491 [1st Dept 2015]).

Concur — Tom, J.P., Renwick, Saxe, Feinman and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salyamov v. Lyhovsky, 2017 NY Slip Op 929, 147 A.D.3d 450, 46 N.Y.S.3d 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 929 (Salyamov v. Lyhovsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salyamov v. Lyhovsky
29 N.Y.3d 920 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)