Salvatore Roselli Memorials v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Salvatore Roselli Memorials v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 372, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 131

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 23, 1952

DocketNo. 56291; petition 6779-R (Pittsburgh)

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 372 (Salvatore Roselli Memorials v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salvatore Roselli Memorials v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 372, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 131 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It appeared from the record that the pieces in question were imported for installation in a cemetery in Connellsville, Pa., and that the petitioner had previously contracted for their execution or fabrication in Italy at a cost of $555. Prior to importation, at the request of the foreign shipper, petitioner had forwarded an advance payment of $150. When the invoice was received, instead of showing the total purchase price of the merchandise, it showed only the balance remaining to be paid, i. e., $405. Because of the fact that the petitioner believed the entire memorial to be entitled to free entry as original sculptures or statuary under paragraph 1807, Tariff Act of 1930, he did not examine the invoice when it was received but forwarded it to a customs broker with instructions to make entry in accordance therewith. The appraiser returned the value of the entire memorial at $555, and advisorily classified the same as dutiable as marble, wholly manufactured into monuments, at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 232 (d), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802). The court found that the undervaluation on entry was the result of a combination of the error on the part of the shipper in failing to indicate the entire cost of the shipment and the inexperience in customs matters of the petitioner. It was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It appeared from the record that the pieces in question were imported for installation in a cemetery in Connellsville, Pa., and that the petitioner had previously contracted for their execution or fabrication in Italy at a cost of $555. Prior to importation, at the request of the foreign shipper, petitioner had forwarded an advance payment of $150. When the invoice was received, instead of showing the total purchase price of the merchandise, it showed only the balance remaining to be paid, i. e., $405. Because of the fact that the petitioner believed the entire memorial to be entitled to free entry as original sculptures or statuary under paragraph 1807, Tariff Act of 1930, he did not examine the invoice when it was received but forwarded it to a customs broker with instructions to make entry in accordance therewith. The appraiser returned the value of the entire memorial at $555, and advisorily classified the same as dutiable as marble, wholly manufactured into monuments, at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 232 (d), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802). The court found that the undervaluation on entry was the result of a combination of the error on the part of the shipper in failing to indicate the entire cost of the shipment and the inexperience in customs matters of the petitioner. It was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Cust. Ct. 372, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salvatore-roselli-memorials-v-united-states-cusc-1952.