Salvation Army Petition

72 Pa. D. & C. 157, 1950 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 144
CourtPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Warren County
DecidedSeptember 6, 1950
Docketno. 44
StatusPublished

This text of 72 Pa. D. & C. 157 (Salvation Army Petition) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Warren County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salvation Army Petition, 72 Pa. D. & C. 157, 1950 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 144 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1950).

Opinion

Waite, P. J.,

sixth judicial district, specially presiding,

This matter is before the court on a petition for a decree authorizing (a) “The purchase of a certain parcel of land now owned by Nellie E. Lounsbury, fronting on Market Street in the Borough of Warren, Pa., and adjoining a certain piece or parcel of land owned by a local organization of the Salvation Army of Pennsylvania now under [158]*158option to petitioners at a price of $25,000.” and (b) “The erection thereon (at a cost not to exceed $35,000) of an addition to petitioners’ existing building;” (c) for the purpose of “instructing children of Warren County and elsewhere in agriculture, other vocations and common educational subjects”, and (d) “Providing a refuge for children where they may enjoy recreation and training under influences that will result in their attaining a high character in their callings and becoming useful citizens.”

From exhibit A attached to petitioner’s brief it appears that as of March 31, 1950, there was in the said “Cobham Fund” the sum of $112,245.69, which we are informed that by reason of careful management and investments is now producing an annual income of more than $500 per month.

Henry Cobham and Ann Cobham, his wife, from whose estates the “Cobham Fund” originated were heirs and legatees of George Ashworth Cobham, who came originally from England, and having acquired the property known as Stonylonesome situated on the hills in Glade Township of Warren County, Pa., northeast of the present Borough of Warren, Pa. “Stony-lonesome”, having a large home erected thereon bearing the same name, originally consisted of 150 acres of land, which by a later purchase was extended to the north bank of the Allegheny River and contained at one time approximately 1,000 acres of land more or less (see Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases cited in the next paragraph relating to the same trust estate) and which came into possession of Henry Cobham and Ann Cobham, his wife, on the death of George Ash-worth Cobham on October 6, 1870.

There has been some litigation relative to this property (see Sager v. Mead, 164 Pa. 125, and 171 Pa. 349 and Salvation Army v. Lawson, 293 Pa. 459) but so [159]*159far as appeared no title adverse to that of Henry and Ann Cobham has ever been established. The record seems to show that Henry and Ann Cobham, his wife, continued in possession of the Stonylonesome estate up to the time of their death.

On February 16, 1907, Henry Cobham and Ann Cobham, his wife, of Stonylonesome, Warren County, Pa., entered into a trust agreement with the Salvation Army, a religious corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York having its principal office in the City of New York, transferring to it certain securities having an aggregate value of $27,800, in addition to the Stonylonesome estate, subject to a life estate of the grantees to the use of the Stonylone-some estate together with the royalties from certain oil leases covering the Stonylonesome estate and subject after their respective deaths to certain annuities amounting to $400 per year to F. A. Hodges for the joint support of F. A. Hodges and a brother and sister, all of whom, as the record shows, are now deceased and the reservations and annuities fully paid.

In consideration of this grant and conveyance, in addition to the payments above referred to, the Salvation Army agrees as follows:

“First. To erect and maintain buildings as a refuge and school for children where practical farming together with a general common school education shall be taught. The children to be taught in a kindly manner to work so that each one of them may attain a high character in His calling and thus become a useful citizen of the Commonwealth, fitted to conduct a farm in the usual way or to take up a tract of land for his own benefit. The building or buildings above mentioned to be erected a short distance North of the residence of Stony Lonesome if such be deemed practicable by the Party of the First Part.”

[160]*160To clarify the terms of the trust agreement, on November 19, 1912, Henry Cobham wrote a letter, the essential parts of which are as follows:

“In order to avert any possibility of misunderstanding as to the objects of the trust which the Salvation Army has assumed in order to carry out the wishes of my devoted wife and myself, I deem it best that I should set the matter forth at this time in a definite public statement.
“It had long been our desire to establish a refuge and school for orphan or neglected children where practical farming, together with a general common school education should be taught under influences that would result in early attaining a high character in his calling and thus become useful citizens of the Commonwealth ... I desire also to make it very clear that the Salvation Army has not received any benefit to its funds from this trust. It has assumed very great responsibilities for which it is eminently fitted as it now has various institutions of this character throughout the country and it has my very great thanks for undertaking to carry out my wishes after my death. No part of the money can be devoted to the local work of the Salvation Army for it must all be expended in the interest of the Children’s Refuge for Warren County and elsewhere.
“Feeling unable to care for the place any longer I assign it to the Salvation Army who are already making improvements thereon.”

On February 20, 1907, Ann Cobham signed and executed her last will and testament which, after her •death on November 10, 1912, was duly probated. The essential parts of the will so far as this proceeding is concerned are as follows:

“To have and to hold the bequest hereby granted for the benefit of and for the following uses and purposes, not inconsistent with my last will and testament, [161]*161as The Salvation Army and its successors or assigns may from time to time adopt. To erect and maintain buildings as a refuge and school for orphan children where practical farming, together with a general common school education shall be taught; the children to be taught to work with kindness to one another so that each one of them may attain a high character in his calling, and thus become useful citizens of the Commonwealth, and well fittted to conduct a farm in .the usual way or take up a tract of land for his own benefit. The building or buildings above mentioned to be erected a short distance north of the residence of Stony Lonesome if such be deemed practicable by my Legatee aforementioned.”

On July 16, 1913, Henry Cobham signed and executed his last will and testament, which after his death on August 15, 1915, was duly probated. The essential parts of the will so far as this proceeding ■is concerned are as follows:

“Second: I hereby confirm in all respects the will of my beloved wife, Ann Cobham, bearing date the twentieth day of February, A.D. 1907, and probated before the Register of Wills of Warren County, Pa., on the twentieth day of November, A.D., 1912.
“Third: I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate of whatsoever kind and wheresoever situate, to the Salvation Army, a religious and charitable corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salvation Army Incorporated Tr. v. Lawson
143 A. 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Mears's Estate
149 A. 157 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
City of Philadelphia v. Heirs of Girard
45 Pa. 9 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1863)
Sager v. Mead
30 A. 284 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1894)
Sager v. Mead
33 A. 355 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1895)
Kramph's Estate
77 A. 814 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1910)
Hunter's Estate
123 A. 865 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 Pa. D. & C. 157, 1950 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salvation-army-petition-paorphctwarren-1950.