Salvador Becerra v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 14, 2015
Docket12-16-00093-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Salvador Becerra v. State (Salvador Becerra v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salvador Becerra v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Case No. C-43,743 Count one Incident No./trn-. 9206687328 - w JS* C3 3 X Q: The State of Texas § In The 244TH District a ,a> a> o «~"Q § o 2H 1 us v. § Court _ o Q 3- T CSI 0 <-l § m O 3 t— ^i SALVADOR BECERRA § ECTOR County, Texasj to o-Cl cM-J

STATEIDNO.:TX50461912 0 UU iJU~^i c u• -J«5^M Judgment of Conviction by Jury Date Judgment Judge Presiding: HON. JAMES RUSH 12/14/2015 re Entered: BOBBY BLAND Attorney for Attorney for State: JUSTIN LOW LISA BORDEN Defendant:

Offense for which Defendant Convicted: IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY Charging Instrument: Statute for Offense: INDICTMENT 39.0.4 Penal Code Date of Offense: 2/16/2014 Degree of Offense: Plea to Offense: STATE JAIL FELONY NOT GUILTY Verdict of Jury: Fjndingsjm Deadly Weapon: GUILTY N/A~ Plea to 1" Enhancement Plea to 2a

JURY 12/14/2015 12/14/2015 Punishment and Place of Confinement: ONE (1) YEARS STATE JAIL DIVISION, TDCJ THISSENTENCE SHALL RUN CONCURRENTLY. • SENTENCE OF CONFINEMENT SUSPENDED, DEFENDANT PLACED ON COMMUNITY SUPERVISION FOR Fine: Court Costs: Restitution: Restitution Payable to: S 10,000.00 $244.00 $0.00 D VICTIM (see below) D AGENCY/AGENT (see below) _X_ Attachment.A, Order to Withdraw Funds, is incorporated into this judgment and made a part hereof^ SexOffender Registration Requirements do not apply to the Defendant. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. chapter 62. The age ofthe victim at the time ofthe offense wasN/A If Defendant is to serve sentence in TDCJ. enter incarceration periods in chronological order. From 3/13/2014 to 3/17/2014 From 3/31/2014 to 4/1/2014 From 5/29/2014 to 9/4/2014 Time From 12/11/2015 to 12/14/2015 From to From to Credited: If Defendant is to serve sentence in county jail or is eiven credit•toward fine and costs, enter days credited below, N/A DAYS NOTES: N/A Ail pertinent information, names and assessments indicated above are incorporated into the language ofthe judgment below by reference. This cause was called for trial in Ector County, Texas. The State appeared by her District Attorney. Counsel / Waiver of Counsel (select one) [X} Defendantappeared in person with Counsel. D Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to representation by counsel in .writing in open court. Itappeared to the Court that Defendant was mentally competent and had pleaded as shown above to the charging instrument. Both parties announced ready for trial. Ajury was selected, impaneled, and sworn. The INDICTMENT was read to the jury and Defendant entered a plea to the charged offense. The Court received the plea and entered itof record. The jury heard the evidence submitted and argument of counsel. The Court charged the jury as to its duty to determine the guilt or innocence of Defendant, and the jury retired to consider the evidence. Upon returning to open court, the jury delivered its verdict in the presence of Defendant and defense counsel, if any. Iteceira, Salvador C«I3.743 CT 1Conviction by Jury Page I of2 The Court received the verdict and ORDERED it entered upon the minutes of the Court. Punishment Assessed by Jury / Court / No election (select one) IE3 Jury. Defendant entered a plea and filed a written election to have the jury assess punishment. The jury' heard evidencerelative to the question of punishment. The Court charged the jury and it retired to consider the question of punishment. After due deliberation, the jury was brought into Court, and, in open court, it returned its verdict as indicated above. • Court. Defendant elected to have the Court assess punishment. After hearing evidence relative to the question of punishment, the Court assessed Defendant's punishment as indicated above. D No Election. Defendant did not file a written election as to whether the judge or jury should assess punishment. After hearing evidence relative to the question of punishment, the Court assessed Defendant's punishment as indicated above. The Court FINDS Defendant committed the above offense and ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that Defendant is GUILTY of the above offense. The Court FlNDS the Presentence Investigation, if so ordered, was done according to the applicable provisions of TEX. CODE Crim. PROC. art. 42.12 § 9. The Court ORDERS Defendant, punished as indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendant to pay all fines, court costs, and restitution as indicated above. Punishment Options (select one) §3 Confinement in State Jail or Institutional Division. The CourtOrders the authorized agent of the State of Texas or the Sheriffof this County to take, safelyconvey, and deliverDefendant to the Director, State Jail Division, TDCJ. The Court Orders Defendant to be confined for the period and in the manner indicated above. The Court ORDERS Defendant remanded to the custody ofthe Sheriff ofthis county until the Sheriffcanobey the directions ofthis sentence. The Court ORDERS that upon release from confinement, Defendant proceed immediately to the ECTOR COUNTY COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT. Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant topay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, court costs, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. • County Jail—Confinement / Confinement in Lieu of Payment. The CourtORDERS Defendant immediately committed to the custody ofthe SheriffofEctor County, Texas on the date the sentence is to commence. Defendant shall be conGned in the Ector County Jail for the period indicated above. The Court Orders that upon release from confinement, Defendant shall proceed immediately to the ECTOR COUNTY COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT. Once there, the Court Orders Defendant to pay, or make arrangements to pay, any remaining unpaid fines, courtcosts, and restitution as ordered by the Court above. 'Q Fine Only Payment. The punishment assessed against Defendant is for a FINE ONLY. The Court ORDERS Defendant to proceed immediately to the Office ofthe Ector County . Once there, the Court ORDERS Defendant to pay ormake arrangements topay all fines and court costs as ordered by the Court in this cause. Execution / Suspension of Sentence (select one) [X] The Court ORDERS Defendant's sentence EXECUTED. • The CourtOrders Defendant's sentence ofconfinement SUSPENDED. The Court ORDERS Defendant placed on community supervision for the adjudged period (above) so long as Defendant abides by and does not violate the terms and conditions of community supervision. The order setting forth the terms and conditions ofcommunity supervision is incorporated intothis judgment by reference. The CourtORDERS that Defendant is given creditnoted above on this sentence for the time spent incarcerated. Furthermore, the following special findings or orders apply: THE COURT ORDERS THAT DEFENDANT PAY:

$ 10,000.00 FINE $ 244.00 COURT COSTS

Signed and entered on December 14, 2015

Clcr

Right Thumbprint

ISocerra. Salvador C-13.7-13 CT 1 Conviction by Jury Pope 2 of 2 Case No. C-43,743 COUNT TWO INCIDENT NO./TRN: 9206687328

The State of Texas § In The 244TH District § v. § Court § SALVADOR BECERRA § ECTOR County, Texas

SlAlLlDNo TX50461912

JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION BY JURY Date Judgment Judge Piesidtng. Hon. JAMES RUSH 12/14/2015 Entered: BOBBY BLAND Attorney for Attorney for State: JUSTIN LOW LISA BORDEN Defendant:

Offense for which Defendant Convicted: IMPROPER SEXUAL ACTIVITY WITH PERSON IN CUSTODY Charging Instrument: Statute for Offense: INDICTMENT 39.04 Penal Code D a te. of.Offense.: 2/19/2014 Degree of Offense: Plea to Offense: STATE JAIL FELONY NOT GUILTY Verdict of Jury: Findings on Deadly Weapon:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Salvador Becerra v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salvador-becerra-v-state-texapp-2015.