Salvador Araujo-Falcon v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
DecidedMarch 18, 2026
Docket04-26-00066-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Salvador Araujo-Falcon v. the State of Texas (Salvador Araujo-Falcon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salvador Araujo-Falcon v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-26-00066-CR

Salvador ARAUJO-FALCON, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas Trial Court No. 25-02-08905-MCRAJA Honorable Amado J. Abascal III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2026

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant attempts to appeal his conviction for assault on a public servant. “A timely

notice of appeal is necessary to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.” Taylor v. State, 424 S.W.3d

39, 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). “A defendant’s notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days

after the day sentence is imposed or suspended, or within ninety days after sentencing if the

defendant timely files a motion for new trial.” Id. (citing TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1)). 04-26-00066-CR

The trial court imposed sentence on October 16, 2025. Because appellant filed a motion

for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on January 14, 2026. TEX. R. APP.

P. 26.2(a)(1). However, appellant did not file his notice of appeal until January 15, 2026, and did

not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. “When a notice of appeal is

filed within the fifteen-day period [to file a motion for extension of time] but no timely motion for

extension of time is filed, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction.” Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519,

522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ex parte Matthews, 452 S.W.3d 8, 11 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio 2014, no pet.) (“A late notice of appeal may be considered timely and invoke a court of

appeals’ jurisdiction if ‘(1) it is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a

motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day

allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension

of time.’” (quoting Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522)). Because appellant did not file a motion for

extension of time within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, his

notice of appeal is untimely.

On February 2, 2026, we ordered appellant to show cause, on or before February 17, 2026,

why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date, we have not received a

response to our show cause order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Do not publish.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Taylor, Henry Earl
424 S.W.3d 39 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Ex Parte Devan S. Matthews
452 S.W.3d 8 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Salvador Araujo-Falcon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salvador-araujo-falcon-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.