Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Saluto v. Town of Carmel

Saluto v. Town of Carmel

87 A.D.3d 686, 928 N.Y.2d 641
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 23, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.3d 686 (Saluto v. Town of Carmel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saluto v. Town of Carmel, 87 A.D.3d 686, 928 N.Y.2d 641 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]). Skelos, J.P., Belen, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 A.D.3d 686, 928 N.Y.2d 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saluto-v-town-of-carmel-nyappdiv-2011.