Saltzman v. Friedman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Saltzman v. Friedman

88 N.Y.S. 1115

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided May 5, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No point is made by appellants on plaintiff’s branch of the ease, and their-contention relates solely to questions connected with the counterclaim interposed by them. They-appear to be mostly questions of fact, which were properly submitted to the jury. The record discloses no errors in the admission of evidence or the charge of the court, and the verdict is sufficiently supported by the evidence. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with-costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

No point is made by appellants on plaintiff’s branch of the ease, and their-contention relates solely to questions connected with the counterclaim interposed by them. They-appear to be mostly questions of fact, which were properly submitted to the jury. The record discloses no errors in the admission of evidence or the charge of the court, and the verdict is sufficiently supported by the evidence. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with-costs.

Saltzman v. Friedman, 88 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

88 N.Y.S. 1115 (Saltzman v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.