Saltzman v. Friedman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Saltzman v. Friedman

88 N.Y.S. 1115

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 5, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.Y.S. 1115 (Saltzman v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saltzman v. Friedman, 88 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

No point is made by appellants on plaintiff’s branch of the ease, and their-contention relates solely to questions connected with the counterclaim interposed by them. They-appear to be mostly questions of fact, which were properly submitted to the jury. The record discloses no errors in the admission of evidence or the charge of the court, and the verdict is sufficiently supported by the evidence. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with-costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

No point is made by appellants on plaintiff’s branch of the ease, and their-contention relates solely to questions connected with the counterclaim interposed by them. They-appear to be mostly questions of fact, which were properly submitted to the jury. The record discloses no errors in the admission of evidence or the charge of the court, and the verdict is sufficiently supported by the evidence. The judgment and order must be affirmed, with-costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saltzman-v-friedman-nyappterm-1904.