Saltkill v. Cavender Toyota
Opinion
Case: 25-50688 Document: 70-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit
FILED
No. 25-50688 April 29, 2026 Summary Calendar
Lyle W. Cayce
____________ Clerk
Desiree Lee Saltkill,
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Cavender Toyota; Toyota Motor Credit Corporation,
Defendants—Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:25-CV-390
Before Davis, Wilson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Desiree Lee Saltkill, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). On de novo review, see Hernandez v. W. Tex. Treasures Est. Sales, L.L.C., 79 F.4th 464, 469 (5th Cir. 2023), we find that her suit is patently frivolous. The district court correctly determined that Saltkill’s personally-
*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
Case: 25-50688 Document: 70-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/29/2026
No. 25-50688
created bill of exchange was not a legitimate form of payment to satisfy her debt for the purchase of a vehicle and properly dismissed her suit with prejudice and without leave to amend, see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); George v. SI Grp., Inc., 36 F.4th 611, 619 (5th Cir. 2022); Mendoza- Tarango v. Flores, 982 F.3d 395, 402 (5th Cir. 2020). Saltkill is WARNED that further frivolous or otherwise abusive filings will result in sanctions, which may include restrictions on her ability to file pleadings in this Court and any other court within this Court’s jurisdiction.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saltkill v. Cavender Toyota (Saltkill v. Cavender Toyota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.