Salters, Alexis v. Healthchannels, LLC d/b/a Scribe America

2020 TN WC 115
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedOctober 28, 2020
Docket2020-08-0492
StatusPublished

This text of 2020 TN WC 115 (Salters, Alexis v. Healthchannels, LLC d/b/a Scribe America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salters, Alexis v. Healthchannels, LLC d/b/a Scribe America, 2020 TN WC 115 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2020).

Opinion

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT MEMPHIS

ALEXIS SALTERS, ) Docket No. 2020-08-0492 Claimant, )

V. )

HEALTHCHANNELS, LLC d/b/a )

SCRIBE AMERICA, ) State File No. 20286-2020 Respondent, )

And )

SENTRY CASUALTY COMPANY, ) Carrier. ) Judge Deana C. Seymour

COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Court held a hearing on HealthChannels, LLC’s motion for summary judgment on October 23, 2020. The dispositive issue is whether HealthChannels is entitled to summary judgment because Ms. Salters failed to timely file her claim. For the reasons below, the Court holds that HealthChannels is entitled to summary judgment.

Procedural History

Ms. Salters claimed injuries to her head, ear, and mouth after fainting and falling at work on April 15, 2019. HealthChannels denied the claim based on the idiopathic nature of Ms. Salters’s injury.

Ms. Salters filed a Petition for Benefit Determination requesting workers’ compensation benefits on May 12, 2020. HealthChannels filed its motion, along with a statement of undisputed facts, on August 26, 2020. Ms. Salters did not respond to the motion as required by Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56.03.’

' During the motion hearing, Ms. Salters alleged she never received the motion or attachments, which explained the requirements of Rule 56. HealthChannels’s attorney verified the documents were served by mail and email, and the Court granted permission for it to file proof of service following the hearing. HealthChannels filed the sworn statement of Ashley Namynanik, which included the email that was sent to Ms. Salters on August 26, 2020. HealthChannels’s Motion

HealthChannels filed a statement of undisputed material facts with citations to the record in compliance with Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56.03 and the sworn declaration of Laurel Sitze, the claims adjuster from Sentry Casualty Co. assigned to Ms. Salters’s claim. The Court summarizes the material facts as follows: 1) Ms. Salters filed her PBD on May 12, 2020; 2) Ms. Salters seeks temporary and medical benefits arising out of an incident at work on April 15, 2019; 3) HealthChannels denied Ms. Salters’s claim; and 4) HealthChannels did not voluntarily pay workers’ compensation benefits to or on behalf of Ms. Salters from April 15, 2019, to April 15, 2020. HealthChannels contended it was entitled to summary judgment because Ms. Salters failed to file her PBD within the one-year statute of limitations in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50- 6-203(b)(1) (2019).

Analysis

Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04 (2019).

As the moving party, HealthChannels must do one of two things to prevail on its motion: (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Ms. Salters’s claim, or (2) demonstrate that her evidence is insufficient to establish an essential element of her claim. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101 (2019); see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). If HealthChannels is successful in meeting this burden, Ms. Salters must then establish that the record contains specific facts upon which the Court could base a decision in her favor. Jd. at 265.

Ms. Salters filed no response opposing HealthChannels’s properly-supported motion for summary judgment, and she failed to meet the technical requirement of Rule 56 by responding to HealthChannels’s statement of undisputed facts. Therefore, the Court finds the motion and the facts undisputed. The issue then is whether under Rule 56.06 summary judgment is “appropriate.”

Under Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203, an employee’s right to recover compensation is forever barred unless the employee files a PBD within one year after the accident resulting in injury. Here, Ms. Salters’s accident occurred on April 15, 2019, but she did not file her PBD until May 12, 2020.

The statute of limitations can be extended by payments made on the claim. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(2). However, based on Ms. Sitze’s sworn statement, no

2 benefits were paid on the claim between April 15, 2019, and April 15, 2020. Considering the merits of HealthChannels’s motion, the Court finds it successfully demonstrated that Ms. Salters failed to timely file her claim.

Since HealthChannels met its burden, the Court considers whether Ms. Salters identified facts upon which the Court could base a decision in her favor. As Ms. Salters failed to respond to the motion as required by Rule 56, she cannot dispute any of the facts HealthChannels asserted in its statement of material facts. See Union Serv. Indus., Inc. v. Sloan, 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 592, at *4 (Tenn. Ct. App. Sept. 28, 1988). Therefore, the Court finds Ms. Salters failed to identify any facts showing a genuine issue for trial.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. HealthChannels’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Ms. Salters’s claim is dismissed with prejudice to its refiling.

2. Absent appeal, this order shall become final thirty days after entry.

3. The Court taxes the $150.00 filing fee to HealthChannels under Tennessee Compilation Rules and Regulations 0800-02-21-.06, payable to the clerk within five days of this order becoming final.

4. HealthChannels shall prepare and submit the SD-2 with the Clerk within ten days of the date of judgment.

ENTERED October 28, 2020.

at c el | “.

Judge Deana C. Seymour Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on October 28, 2020.

Name Certified | U.S. | Email | Service sent to: Mail Mail Alexis Salters, xX xX xX 8908 Bell Forrest Drive Employee Olive Branch, Mississippi 38654 ansalters@gmail.com LeeAnne Murray, X =| leeamurray@feeneymurray.com

Employer’s Attorney

} / mI A iM

Penny Shrivn, Clerk of Court Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims We.courtclerk@tn.gov

Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:

If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must:

1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).

2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fully- completed Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al.
477 S.W.3d 235 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 TN WC 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salters-alexis-v-healthchannels-llc-dba-scribe-america-tennworkcompcl-2020.