Salter v. State

769 So. 2d 430, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11794, 2000 WL 1298831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 15, 2000·No. No. 1D00-2265·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the denial of his postconviction motion, which raised a facially sufficient claim under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The trial court denied the motion because the appellant was sentenced to a negotiated term. However, the court failed to attach a copy of the plea agreement. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court for attachments which refute the appellant’s claim.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ERVIN, LAWRENCE and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salter v. State, 769 So. 2d 430, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11794, 2000 WL 1298831 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

769 So. 2d 430 (Salter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)