Salter v. Ivey
This text of 34 Ala. 557 (Salter v. Ivey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
R. W. "WALKER, J.
The proceedings in this case were exceedingly informal. But we think it sufficiently appears that this was intended as a prosecution, under section 1172 of the Code, by the apportioner, in the name of, and for the benefit of the county. In such a case, the apportioner who makes the return, and on whose complaint the summons is issued, ought not to be held responsible for the costs.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Ala. 557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salter-v-ivey-ala-1859.