Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar

6 N.J.L. 493
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1797·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the application right, and that it ought to be granted.

Motion granted.

Note. — In Massachusetts it has been held, in a case of this kind, that a special count laying a promise to an administrator is unnecessary, (Baxter v. Penniman, 8 Mass. 133) though it is required in the English practice. Dean v. Crane, 1 Salk. 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar, 6 N.J.L. 493 (N.J. 1797).

6 N.J.L. 493 (Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.