Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar

6 N.J.L. 493
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 15, 1797
StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.J.L. 493 (Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saltar v. Administrator of Saltar, 6 N.J.L. 493 (N.J. 1797).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the application right, and that it ought to be granted.

Motion granted.

Note. — In Massachusetts it has been held, in a case of this kind, that a special count laying a promise to an administrator is unnecessary, (Baxter v. Penniman, 8 Mass. 133) though it is required in the English practice. Dean v. Crane, 1 Salk. 28.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.J.L. 493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saltar-v-administrator-of-saltar-nj-1797.