Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. National Labor Relations Board

Ninth Circuit

Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. National Labor Relations Board

498 F.2d 393

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 17, 1974

Docket73-2539

StatusPublished

This text of 498 F.2d 393 (Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salt River Valley Water Users' Association v. National Labor Relations Board, 498 F.2d 393 (9th Cir. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

*394 OPINION

Before KOELSCH, WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Salt River Valley Users’ Association, seeks reversal of an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to a finding that Assistant Transmission Water Masters (ATWM’s) employed by petitioner are not supervisors within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 152(11). The Board has cross-applied for enforcement of its order, contending that by insisting upon excluding ATWM’s from the appropriate bargaining unit and refusing to recognize the Union as their bargaining representative, the Association has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act. The Board’s decision is reported at 204 N.L.R.B. No. 26.

We deny the relief sought by the Petitioner and grant the Board’s cross-application, for enforcement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*394 OPINION

Before KOELSCH, WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Salt River Valley Users’ Association, seeks reversal of an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to a finding that Assistant Transmission Water Masters (ATWM’s) employed by petitioner are not supervisors within the meaning of Section 2(11) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 152(11). The Board has cross-applied for enforcement of its order, contending that by insisting upon excluding ATWM’s from the appropriate bargaining unit and refusing to recognize the Union as their bargaining representative, the Association has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act. The Board’s decision is reported at 204 N.L.R.B. No. 26.

We deny the relief sought by the Petitioner and grant the Board’s cross-application, for enforcement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

498 F.2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salt-river-valley-water-users-association-v-national-labor-relations-ca9-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack