Salt & Light Co. v. Mount Holly Twp.

16 N.J. Tax 40
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided September 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Mount Holly Township appeals from seven judgments entered in the Tax Court determining that seven separate parcels of land owned by plaintiff are tax exempt for the tax year 1995, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6. On this appeal defendant contends:

THE TAX COURT ERRED IN ITS APPLICATION OP NEW JERSEY CASE LAW DECIDED UNDER N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6 TO THE FACTS OF THIS MATTER IN REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE BURLINGTON COUNT BOARD OF TAXATION, AS THE TAXPAYER SALT AND LIGHT COMPANY, INC.’S PROPERTY IS NOT EXEMPT FROM TAXATION BY DEFENDANT MOUNT HOLLY TOWNSHIP PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 54:4-3.6.

[41]*41We have carefully reviewed the record and, in light of applicable law, we conclude that defendant’s contention is clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Hamill’s opinion of November 8, 1995, reported at 15 N.J.Tax 274 (Tax 1995).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salt & Light Co. v. Mount Holly Twp., 16 N.J. Tax 40 (N.J. Ct. App. 1996).

16 N.J. Tax 40 (Salt & Light Co. v. Mount Holly Twp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Advance Housing, Inc. v. Township of Teaneck
74 A.3d 876 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2013)
Advance Housing v. Tp. of Teaneck
28 A.3d 841 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
Community Access Unlimited Inc. v. City of Elizabeth
21 N.J. Tax 604 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2003)
Essex Properties Urban Renewal Associates, Inc. v. City of Newark
20 N.J. Tax 360 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2002)
Southern Jersey Family Medical Centers, Inc. v. City of Pleasantville
798 A.2d 120 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
1711 Third Avenue, Inc. v. City of Asbury Park
16 N.J. Tax 174 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1996)