Salt Lake Investment Co. v. Fox

112 P. 808, 38 Utah 309, 1911 Utah LEXIS 2
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 6, 1911
DocketNo. 2053
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 P. 808 (Salt Lake Investment Co. v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salt Lake Investment Co. v. Fox, 112 P. 808, 38 Utah 309, 1911 Utah LEXIS 2 (Utah 1911).

Opinion

STRAUP, J.

Upon application of Fox an alternative writ of mandate was issued to the district court requiring it to make findings [310]*310and to render judgment in the above canse. After tbe writ was served tbe district court made findings and rendered a judgment. Erom tbe judgment Fox appealed to tbis court. Tbe judgment, on apppeal, was vacated, and in lieu thereof, tbe district court was ordered to enter a judgment as directed by us. (Salt Lake Inv. Co. v. Fox, 37 Utah 334, 108 Pac. 1132.) Tbis proceeding is therefore 1, 2 dismissed. As tbe action of tbe district court was induced, and defended in tbis proceeding, by tbe Salt Labe Investment Company, it is ordered that tbe taxable costs, amounting to ten dollars, be paid by it.

PRICE, C. L, and MeCARTY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fowler v. Gillman
290 P. 358 (Utah Supreme Court, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 P. 808, 38 Utah 309, 1911 Utah LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salt-lake-investment-co-v-fox-utah-1911.