Salt Lake City v. Revene
127 P.2d 254, 101 Utah 512, 1942 Utah LEXIS 18
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Salt Lake City v. Revene. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 Utah 504 →
Opinion
By inadvertence costs in this case were allowed against the city. This was error. See Nephi City v. Forrest, 41 Utah 433, 126 P. 332. That part of the decision which reads “costs to respondent” [124 P. 2d 537, 540] is hereby stricken and with that change the opinion and decision is confirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salt Lake City v. Revene, 127 P.2d 254, 101 Utah 512, 1942 Utah LEXIS 18 (Utah 1942).
127 P.2d 254 (Salt Lake City v. Revene) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Salt Lake City v. Revene
124 P.2d 537 (Utah Supreme Court, 1942)
Nephi City v. Forrest
126 P. 332 (Utah Supreme Court, 1912)