Salsman v. National Community Bank

251 A.2d 460, 105 N.J. Super. 164, 6 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 168, 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 505
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided March 19, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

The judgment herein is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Botter in his opinion reported at 102 N. J. Super. 482 (Law Div. 1968). Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salsman v. National Community Bank, 251 A.2d 460, 105 N.J. Super. 164, 6 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 168, 1969 N.J. Super. LEXIS 505 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).

251 A.2d 460 (Salsman v. National Community Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salsman v. NAT. COMMUNITY BANK OF RUTHERFORD
251 A.2d 460 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)