Salpeter v. Seville Hotel, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Salpeter v. Seville Hotel, Inc.

9 A.D.2d 909, 195 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 909 (Salpeter v. Seville Hotel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salpeter v. Seville Hotel, Inc., 9 A.D.2d 909, 195 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is (1) from an order entered December 22, 1958, granting respondent’s motion to vacate the alleged service of the summons upon it, on the ground that respondent is not doing business within this State, and (2) from an order entered May 19, 1959, denying appellant’s motion for reargument. Order entered December 22, 1958 affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order entered May 19, 1959 dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reargument (Cohen v. Kashel [Appeal No. 11, 280 App. Div. 992). Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Murphy, J., deceased.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is (1) from an order entered December 22, 1958, granting respondent’s motion to vacate the alleged service of the summons upon it, on the ground that respondent is not doing business within this State, and (2) from an order entered May 19, 1959, denying appellant’s motion for reargument. Order entered December 22, 1958 affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order entered May 19, 1959 dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from an order denying a motion for reargument (Cohen v. Kashel [Appeal No. 11, 280 App. Div. 992). Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Murphy, J., deceased.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 909, 195 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salpeter-v-seville-hotel-inc-nyappdiv-1959.