Salomon v. Taylor

50 Fla. 608
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 Fla. 608 (Salomon v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salomon v. Taylor, 50 Fla. 608 (Fla. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

.Belknap Hardware Company and Hargadine-McKittrick Dry Goods Company, sued out this appeal on July 30, 1904, in their own name and in the name of Julius Salomon, as Assignee of Thomas J. Taylor, from a decree of the date of February 9, 1904, purporting to have been made in a suit wherein the said Taylor was complainant and the said Salomon as Assignee and the Said corporations were defendants. The only decree in the record is one entered in a suit between the said Taylor and the said Salomon, as Assignee alone. There is nothing in the record prior in time to the entry of the appeal to show that the corporations were, or even offered to become parties to the suit, nor that they had any interest in the subject matter of the suit, as privies or otherwise: and the appeal is, therefore, dismissed at their cost.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

SR Acquisitions—Florida City, LLC v. San Remo Homes at Florida City, LLC
78 So. 3d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Simon
492 So. 2d 1159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Hope v. Lipkin
156 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 Fla. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salomon-v-taylor-fla-1905.