Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, M.D., Delores Thomas

331 F.3d 1286, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920, 2003 WL 21251445
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 30, 2003·No. 00-12627·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

*1287 Before TJOFLAT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and SHAPIRO * , District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 123 S.Ct. 588, 154 L.Ed.2d 491 (2002). Harvey v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 718, 154 L.Ed.2d 629 (2002). We directed the parties to file supplemental briefs discussing the effects of Howsam on the present case. The parties complied with our directive.

After carefully reviewing the Howsam decision, and reading the parties’ supplemental briefs, we vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this case with directions to the district court to vacate its injunction and require Salomon Smith Barney to arbitrate.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, M.D., Delores Thomas, 331 F.3d 1286, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920, 2003 WL 21251445 (11th Cir. 2003).

331 F.3d 1286 (Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, M.D., Delores Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related