Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, M.D., Delores Thomas

331 F.3d 1286, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920, 2003 WL 21251445
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 2003
Docket00-12627
StatusPublished

This text of 331 F.3d 1286 (Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, M.D., Delores Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. Arthur Harvey, M.D., Delores Thomas, 331 F.3d 1286, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920, 2003 WL 21251445 (11th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

*1287 Before TJOFLAT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and SHAPIRO * , District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 123 S.Ct. 588, 154 L.Ed.2d 491 (2002). Harvey v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 718, 154 L.Ed.2d 629 (2002). We directed the parties to file supplemental briefs discussing the effects of Howsam on the present case. The parties complied with our directive.

After carefully reviewing the Howsam decision, and reading the parties’ supplemental briefs, we vacate the district court’s judgment and remand this case with directions to the district court to vacate its injunction and require Salomon Smith Barney to arbitrate.

VACATED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 F.3d 1286, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10920, 2003 WL 21251445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salomon-smith-barney-inc-v-arthur-harvey-md-delores-thomas-ca11-2003.