Salomon Bros. Realty Corp. v. Alvarez

22 A.D.3d 482, 802 N.Y.S.2d 705
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 3, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 22 A.D.3d 482 (Salomon Bros. Realty Corp. v. Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salomon Bros. Realty Corp. v. Alvarez, 22 A.D.3d 482, 802 N.Y.S.2d 705 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated July 19, 2004, as (a) denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment with leave to renew after joinder of necessary parties, (b) denied that branch of its motion which was to strike the answer and affirmative defenses of Edward E Hallen, and (c) directed the joinder of necessary parties, and Edward E Hallen cross-appeals from stated portions of the same order.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned, without costs or disbursements (see 22 NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly directed that the heirs of the deceased mortgagor be joined as necessary parties to the action. The record does not reflect that the plaintiff exercised the due diligence required by CPLR 315 to permit service by publication upon these necessary parties (see Caban v Caban, 116 AD2d 783 [1986]; First Union Natl. Bank v Estate of Bailey, 7 Misc 3d 1027[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50793[U] [Sup Ct, Kings County, May 26, 2005]; cf. Levy v Robinson, 41 AD2d 558 [1973]; Matter of McFarland, 7 Misc 3d 1003[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 50418[U] [Sur Ct, Nassau County, Mar. 31, 2005]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiff s remaining contentions. Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Public Admr. of Suffolk County
2025 NY Slip Op 05009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
United States v. Battle
W.D. New York, 2022
NRZ Pass-Through Trust IV v. Tarantola
2021 NY Slip Op 01423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Gedeon
2020 NY Slip Op 1660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Safena v. Giuliano
53 A.D.3d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 A.D.3d 482, 802 N.Y.S.2d 705, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salomon-bros-realty-corp-v-alvarez-nyappdiv-2005.