Salome v. State

178 So. 462, 28 Ala. App. 67, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 44
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 18, 1938
Docket6 Div. 177.
StatusPublished

This text of 178 So. 462 (Salome v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salome v. State, 178 So. 462, 28 Ala. App. 67, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 44 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of illegally having in possession whisky and beer.

We observe not much that needs to be said.

The case being first tried in an inferior court — as was provided by law — and reaching the circuit court by appeal, it was of course too late to file, for the first time in the circuit court, a plea in abatement. Bush v. State, 27 Ala.App. 30, 167 So. 335. And it was altogether proper to strike said plea on the State’s motion.

The evidence appears to us ample to support the verdict' of the jury. There was, hence, no error in overruling appellant’s motion to set same aside; and the judgment entered thereon is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bush v. State
167 So. 335 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 So. 462, 28 Ala. App. 67, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salome-v-state-alactapp-1938.