Salome Osueke v. PS LPT Properties Investors

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 26, 2018
Docket01-18-00119-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Salome Osueke v. PS LPT Properties Investors (Salome Osueke v. PS LPT Properties Investors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salome Osueke v. PS LPT Properties Investors, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Opinion issued July 26, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00119-CV ——————————— SALOME OSUEKE, Appellant V. PS LPT PROPERTIES INVESTORS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1105083

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Salome Osueke, proceeding pro se, has failed to timely file her

appellate brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1), (d), 38.8(a)(1). On June 4, 2018, the

county clerk filed an info sheet in this Court stating that, after the clerk’s record had

been mailed to the appellant, it had been returned and marked as: “RETURN TO SENDER[,] UNDELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED[,] UNABLE TO

FORWARD.” On June 26, 2018, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that her

appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to timely file her appellate brief or an

extension and a current mailing address and requested a response within 10 days of

the date of that notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b), 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant neither timely filed her brief nor provided the Clerk of this Court with any

other address. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.1(b) (“A party not represented by counsel must

sign any document . . . and give the party’s mailing address, telephone number, fax

number, if any, and email address.”); 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to

timely file an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Salome Osueke v. PS LPT Properties Investors, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salome-osueke-v-ps-lpt-properties-investors-texapp-2018.