Salmons v. State

626 S.E.2d 584, 277 Ga. App. 380, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 343, 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 92
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 25, 2006
DocketA05A2324
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 626 S.E.2d 584 (Salmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salmons v. State, 626 S.E.2d 584, 277 Ga. App. 380, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 343, 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 92 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

After being charged by indictment with the offense of robbery by sudden snatching, Frank Salmons entered a negotiated guilty plea to the offense of felony theft by taking. Salmons filed two motions for reconsideration of his sentence in December 2004. Following the denial of those motions, he appeals. Because the motions were both untimely and meritless, we affirm.

1. Generally, a motion for reconsideration must be “filed within the term of court in which the judgment was entered. [Cit.]” Harris v. State, 278 Ga. 280, 282, n. 3 (600 SE2d 592) (2004). Salmons was sentenced on June 7, 2004, during the April term of court for Lanier County. See OCGA § 15-6-3 (1). His December 2004 motions fell with in the October term of court. Id. Those motions therefore were not timely.

2. Even if the motions had been made in a timely manner, however, we find no merit in Salmons’s arguments. First, the transcript of the guilty plea hearing amply demonstrates that the State has met its burden of showing that Salmons entered a knowing and voluntary plea. Furthermore, “[a] person may validly waive his or her constitutional rights through the plea bargaining process. Likewise, when a person knowingly and voluntarily enters into a negotiated plea agreement and accepts the conditions of [the agreement] in open court, he or she waives the right to challenge the issue on appeal.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Phillips v. State, 236 Ga. App. 744, 746 (1) (512 SE2d 32) (1999). The trial court did not err in denying Salmons’s motions.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington and Adams, JJ., concur. *381 Decided January 25, 2006. Larry W. Russell, for appellant. Catherine H. Helms, District Attorney, Benjamin T. Edwards, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkinson v. State
641 S.E.2d 189 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Johnson v. State
638 S.E.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 S.E.2d 584, 277 Ga. App. 380, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 343, 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salmons-v-state-gactapp-2006.