Salmons v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Salmons v. State

489 So. 2d 1249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1443, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8820

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1986

DocketNo. 85-2230

StatusPublished

This text of 489 So. 2d 1249 (Salmons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salmons v. State, 489 So. 2d 1249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1443, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8820 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

HALL, Judge.

We find merit in appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in sentencing him pursuant to the guidelines absent his affirmative selection thereof.

Accordingly, we remand with directions that the sentence in this case be modified to reflect that it is not a guidelines sentence. Hart v. State, 464 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HALL, Judge.

We find merit in appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in sentencing him pursuant to the guidelines absent his affirmative selection thereof.

Accordingly, we remand with directions that the sentence in this case be modified to reflect that it is not a guidelines sentence. Hart v. State, 464 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The judgment and sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 So. 2d 1249, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1443, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salmons-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack