Salmon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Salmon v. State

792 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12076, 2001 WL 965039

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 27, 2001

DocketNo. 1D00-4065

StatusPublished

This text of 792 So. 2d 1218 (Salmon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salmon v. State, 792 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12076, 2001 WL 965039 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, without prejudice to the appellant to seek the proper remedy in the appropriate circuit court. See Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889, 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“a circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit and to order a new trial”); see also McLevy v. State, 787 So.2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order denying the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, without prejudice to the appellant to seek the proper remedy in the appropriate circuit court. See Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889, 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“a circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit and to order a new trial”); see also McLevy v. State, 787 So.2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, C.J., PADOVANO and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

792 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12076, 2001 WL 965039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salmon-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack