Salmon v. State
792 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12076, 2001 WL 965039
Opinion
We affirm the order denying the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, without prejudice to the appellant to seek the proper remedy in the appropriate circuit court. See Leichtman v. Singletary, 674 So.2d 889, 891 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“a circuit court has no jurisdiction to review the legality of a conviction in another circuit and to order a new trial”); see also McLevy v. State, 787 So.2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Salmon v. State, 792 So. 2d 1218, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12076, 2001 WL 965039 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
792 So. 2d 1218 (Salmon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leichtman v. Singletary
674 So. 2d 889 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
McLevy v. State
787 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)