Salmon v. Rockefeller Center Management Corp.
This text of 299 A.D.2d 297 (Salmon v. Rockefeller Center Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered May 24, 2001, in a jury trial, dismissing the complaint after the close of evidence, in an action in which plaintiff, an employee of nonparty building owner Rockefeller Center Properties (RCP), seeks to recover for personal injuries allegedly caused by defendant Rockefeller Center Management Corp. (RCMC)’s negligent maintenance of an elevator in the building, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff’s evidence that building personnel who signed contracts with elevator maintenance companies on behalf of RCMC, and in other ways appeared to be RCMC employees responsible for elevator maintenance, was “conclusively answered” with evidence (see McDonald v Metropolitan St. Ry. [298]*298Co., 167 NY 66, 70), including W-2 forms, establishing that such personnel, contrary to their mistaken understanding, were not employees of RCMC but RCP, i.e., plaintiffs coemployees. Therefore, workers’ compensation is plaintiffs exclusive remedy. Certainly, there is no evidence that particular personnel of RCMC supervised the personnel that plaintiff claims were responsible for elevator maintenance. We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Lerner, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 A.D.2d 297, 750 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salmon-v-rockefeller-center-management-corp-nyappdiv-2002.