Salmon v. Coughlin
This text of 159 A.D.2d 881 (Salmon v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, a prisoner at Eastern Correctional Facility in Ulster County, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating an institutional rule which prohibits inmates from possession of controlled substances. The report was based on a random frisk conducted at the yard gate by Correction Officer W. Young, who authored the report. The frisk of petitioner revealed "what was believed to be (7) seven rolled marijuana cigarettes” in petitioner’s right sock. Correction Officer L. Distel performed two NIK
The sequential positive results of the two tests, when coupled with Young’s personal observation and the reports of the officers also identifying the substance as marihuana, provided substantial evidence on which to base the determination (see, Matter of Darnell v Kuhlmann, 145 AD2d 852). Accordingly, the determination appealed from should be confirmed.
[882]*882Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
A color-reactive chemical test which employs the Duquenois-Levine Regeant System (7 NYCRR 1010.5 [d] [Test E]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
159 A.D.2d 881, 553 N.Y.S.2d 223, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salmon-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1990.