Salmon v. Bieniek

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Salmon v. Bieniek

529 So. 2d 710, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 8531, 1988 WL 27774

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 1988

DocketNo. 88-337

StatusPublished

This text of 529 So. 2d 710 (Salmon v. Bieniek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Salmon v. Bieniek, 529 So. 2d 710, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 8531, 1988 WL 27774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

Upon consideration of the appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and the appellant’s response, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is denied. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(4). It is further

ORDERED that, upon consideration of appellant’s initial brief in this cause and it appearing that appellant has presented no preliminary basis for reversal of the order being appealed, the trial court’s order is summarily affirmed. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). It is further

ORDERED that appellee’s motion for attorney's fees is denied, and that appellee’s motion for extension of time to file an answer brief is denied as moot.

FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI