Salmon Ex Rel. Rogers v. McLean

21 S.E. 178, 116 N.C. 209
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 5, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 21 S.E. 178 (Salmon Ex Rel. Rogers v. McLean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Salmon Ex Rel. Rogers v. McLean, 21 S.E. 178, 116 N.C. 209 (N.C. 1895).

Opinion

Claeic, J.:

A new trial can not be granted by a justice of the peace {The Code, 865), but in the cases mentioned in The Code, 845, a rehearing may be allowed. Froneberger v. Lee, 66 N. C., 333; Gambill v. Gambill, 89 N. C., 201; Guano Company v. Bridgers, 93 N. C., 439. Though the judgment was first rendered 12 April, 1887, a rehearing was granted and the new judgment was rendered 2 May, 1887. The statute ran from the 2 May because the first judgment was vacated by the rehearing. This action was begun April 30, 1894, which was within the seven years limited by statute. Oode, Sec. 153 (1). The defendant has *211 no ground to complain, for the rehearing was granted on his motion. In instructing the jury that the judgment was barred, there was error.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gambill v. . Gambill
89 N.C. 201 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1883)
Wm. Froneburger v. . H. D. Lee .
66 N.C. 333 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1872)
Navassa Guano Co. v. Bridgers
93 N.C. 439 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E. 178, 116 N.C. 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/salmon-ex-rel-rogers-v-mclean-nc-1895.