Salmi v. Salmi

941 So. 2d 553, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18971, 2006 WL 3298962
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 15, 2006·No. No. 1D06-4331·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 13, 2006, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is not final. See generally Canfield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002); Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. The Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Transcript, filed on September 20, 2006, is denied as moot.

ERVIN, BARFIELD and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salmi v. Salmi, 941 So. 2d 553, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18971, 2006 WL 3298962 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 553 (Salmi v. Salmi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Caufield v. Cantele
837 So. 2d 371 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Hoffman v. O'CONNOR
802 So. 2d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)