Salman v. State of Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline

23 F. App'x 838
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2001·No. No. 00-17324; D.C. No. CV-99-00659-JLQ·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Albert R. Salman appeals pro se the district court’s orders dismissing his civil rights action alleging that the State of Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline and various state defendants denied him due process and equal protection of the laws by not allowing him to attend one of the Commission’s meetings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss the appeal because Salman has failed to pay sanctions imposed by this court in prior appeals found to be frivolous. See Hymes v. United States, 993 F.2d 701, 702 (9th Cir.1993) (order).

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salman v. State of Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline, 23 F. App'x 838 (9th Cir. 2001).

23 F. App'x 838 (Salman v. State of Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald L. Hymes v. United States
993 F.2d 701 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)