Sally T. Hucks v. United States

301 F.2d 548
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 1962
Docket16471
StatusPublished

This text of 301 F.2d 548 (Sally T. Hucks v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sally T. Hucks v. United States, 301 F.2d 548 (D.C. Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from conviction on an indictment which charged appellant and two others with various counts of perjury and conspiracy to obstruct justice, in connection with proceedings of a grand jury and of the Senate Select Committee on Improper Activities in the Labor and Management Field, commonly known as the “McClellan Committee.” Appellant was given a concurrent sentence of twenty months to five years on each of the counts on which she was convicted. Count Eleven charged her in substance with endeavoring, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 (1958), to impede the administration of justice by influencing Freed, a witness before the grand jury. The conviction and sentence on this count are clearly valid. Under the doctrine of Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 63 S.Ct. 1375, 87 L.Ed. 1774 (1943), since the judgment is upheld on one count of the indictment, we need not reach the remaining assertions of error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hirabayashi v. United States
320 U.S. 81 (Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 F.2d 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sally-t-hucks-v-united-states-cadc-1962.