Salley v. Capra

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 23, 2023·No. 7:23-cv-04566·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SEAN SALLEY, Plaintiff, -against- 23-CV-4566 (KMK) MICHAEL CAPRA; MR. THORPE; C. NIXON; ORDER OF SERVICE ELANE VELEZ; T. ALAM; L. JACKSON- SMITH; QUANDERA QUICK; JOHN DOE, Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Sean Salley (“Plaintiff”), who is currently incarcerated at Shawangunk Correctional Facility, brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that Michael Capra; Mr. Thorpe; C. Nixon; Elane Velez; T. Alam; L. Jackson-Smith; Quandera Quick; and John Doe (together, “Defendants”) treated him differently than other similarly situated prisoners when he was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. By order dated June 7, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.1 As set forth below the Court (1) orders service on the named Defendants, (2) directs the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”) to identify the John Doe Defendant named in this action; and (3) refers Plaintiff to the New York Legal Assistance Group.

1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). DISCUSSION A. Order of Service Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to

serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Superintendent Michael Capra, Deputy of Security Thorpe, Captain C. Nixon, Deputy Elane Velez, Dr. T. Alam, Deputy L. Jackson-Smith, and Supervisory Quandera Quick through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for these named Defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon the named Defendants. If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued,

Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.

2 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. B. John Doe Defendant Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit DOCCS to identify the John Doe Defendant named in this action. It is therefore ordered that the New York State Attorney General, who is the attorney for

and agent of DOCCS, must ascertain the identity and badge number of the John Doe Defendant whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where the John Doe Defendant may be served. The Attorney General must provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must notify the Court, in writing, to request that the Court direct the Clerk of Court to add as a Defendant the newly named John Doe Defendant and to issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 form with the address for the named John Doe Defendant and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service.

C. New York Legal Assistance Group Plaintiff may consult the legal clinic in this District that assists people who are parties in civil cases and do not have lawyers. The Clinic is run by a private organization called the New York Legal Assistance Group (“NYLAG”); it is not part of, or run by, the court (and, among other things, therefore cannot accept filings on behalf of the court, which must still be made by any pro se party through the Pro Se Intake Unit). To receive limited-scope assistance from the Clinic, Plaintiff may mail a signed retainer and intake form to the NYLAG Pro Se Clinic at 40 Foley Square, LL22, NY, NY 10007. Once the paperwork is received, the Clinic will coordinate contact with the litigant. Once the paperwork 1s received, it may take up to two weeks for the Clinic to contact the litigant. Copies of the Clinic’s flyer, retainer, and intake form are attached to this order. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is instructed to (1) issue summonses for Defendants Superintendent Michael Capra, Deputy of Security Thorpe, Captain C. Nixon, Deputy Elane Velez, Dr. T. Alam, Deputy L. Jackson-Smith, and Supervisory Quandera Quick; (2) complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these Defendants; (3) deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service; and (4) mail Plaintiff an information package. Attached to this order are NYLAG’s retainer and intake form. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and the attachments to Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order and the Complaint to: New York State Attorney General, Managing Attommey’s Office, 28 Liberty Street, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10005. Within thirty days of receiving the name and address for the John Doe Defendant, Plaintiff must notify the Court, in writing, to request that the Court issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to add the newly named Defendant and to effect service on this individual. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 23, 2023 Wnt White Plains, New York KENNETH M. KARAS United States District Judge

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

Superintendent Michael Capra Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562-5442 Mr. Thorpe, Deputy of Security Sing Sing Correctional Facility 354 Hunter Street Ossining, NY 10562-5442 Captain C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salley v. Capra, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Salley v. Capra (Salley v. Capra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)