Sallette v. State
553 So. 2d 330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794, 1989 WL 146180
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 6, 1989·No. No. 88-1908·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Fees and costs were imposed against appellant without giving him adequate notice [331] and an opportunity to be heard. This constitutes error, Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), of fundamental proportions. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla.1989). We reverse and remand without prejudice to the state’s right to again seek fees and costs after notice and hearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sallette v. State, 553 So. 2d 330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794, 1989 WL 146180 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
553 So. 2d 330 (Sallette v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stone v. State
642 So. 2d 34 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)