Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sallette v. State

Sallette v. State

553 So. 2d 330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794, 1989 WL 146180
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 6, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 553 So. 2d 330 (Sallette v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sallette v. State, 553 So. 2d 330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794, 1989 WL 146180 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fees and costs were imposed against appellant without giving him adequate notice [331]*331and an opportunity to be heard. This constitutes error, Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), of fundamental proportions. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla.1989). We reverse and remand without prejudice to the state’s right to again seek fees and costs after notice and hearing.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stone v. State
642 So. 2d 34 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 So. 2d 330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6794, 1989 WL 146180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sallette-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.