Salle v. Innovative Capital Club at Cedar Key, LLC

75 So. 3d 863, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20276, 2011 WL 6352304
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Salle v. Innovative Capital Club at Cedar Key, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 So. 3d 1034
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2011·No. No. 1D11-4068·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s responses to the Court’s orders of August 23, 2011, and October 17, 2011, the Court has determined that the Order Denying Cross-Plaintiffs Brian T. Salle and Karen M. Salle’s Cross-Claims as to Damages, is not a final order because it' fails to conclude the judicial labor with respect to the appellants’ cross-claims. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as premature. The Court declines to stay the appeal as requested by the appellants in their response to the October 17, 2011, order. See Demont v. Demont, 24 So.3d 699 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

WOLF, HAWKES, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Salle v. Innovative Capital Club at Cedar Key, LLC, 75 So. 3d 863, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20276, 2011 WL 6352304 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

75 So. 3d 863 (Salle v. Innovative Capital Club at Cedar Key, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Demont v. Demont
24 So. 3d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)