Sallano v. Miami-Dade County
816 So. 2d 208, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6164, 2002 WL 882059
Opinion
Affirmed. See § 57.085(2), Fla. Stat. (2000); Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dep’t, 91 F.3d 451, 458 n. 13 (3d [209] Cir.1996) (under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, merely “submitting an in forma pauperis complaint to the clerk does not result in commencement of the litigation and satisfaction of the statute of limitations.”); Reed v. Mims, 711 So.2d 169, 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“It is evident that [§ 57.085] is patterned after similarly worded 28 U.S.C. § 1915.”)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sallano v. Miami-Dade County, 816 So. 2d 208, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6164, 2002 WL 882059 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
816 So. 2d 208 (Sallano v. Miami-Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Donald Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept. Sean McCormack Asst. D.A. Denis Thomason, Donald Urrutia
91 F.3d 451 (Third Circuit, 1996)
Reed v. Mims
711 So. 2d 169 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)