Sallade v. Sallade

187 A. 152, 121 N.J. Eq. 116
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complainant wife sought separate maintenance as provided for by statute. Her husband answered and counterclaimed for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The advisory master, to whom the case was referred, denied the wife relief and advised a decree of divorce for the husband. We have carefully examined the proofs adduced. They clearly support the findings of fact.

The decree is, therefore, affirmed.

For ■affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sallade v. Sallade, 187 A. 152, 121 N.J. Eq. 116 (N.J. 1936).

187 A. 152 (Sallade v. Sallade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.