Sallade v. Sallade

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sallade v. Sallade

187 A. 152, 121 N.J. Eq. 116

DecidedOctober 5, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 187 A. 152 (Sallade v. Sallade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sallade v. Sallade, 187 A. 152, 121 N.J. Eq. 116 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The complainant wife sought separate maintenance as provided for by statute. Her husband answered and counterclaimed for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The advisory master, to whom the case was referred, denied the wife relief and advised a decree of divorce for the husband. We have carefully examined the proofs adduced. They clearly support the findings of fact.

The decree is, therefore, affirmed.

For ■affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The complainant wife sought separate maintenance as provided for by statute. Her husband answered and counterclaimed for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. The advisory master, to whom the case was referred, denied the wife relief and advised a decree of divorce for the husband. We have carefully examined the proofs adduced. They clearly support the findings of fact.

The decree is, therefore, affirmed.

For ■affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 A. 152, 121 N.J. Eq. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sallade-v-sallade-nj-1936.